According to a review earlier this year, self-employed construction workers are continuing to earn
Published 29th October 2019
According to a review earlier this year, self-employed construction workers are continuing to earn more than those that are employed. The review showed a year-on-year increase in weekly earnings of 6.7%. This translates to an average of £932 a week, which is an increase of £63 from the first quarter of 2018.
The study, carried out by the Office of National Statistics, revealed that construction salaries averaged £24,000 last year, whereas the earning potentials of a freelance construction worker can reach up to £50,000. This shows the income potential of those who are prepared to give up the comfort blanket of being employed to become self-employed.
It’s clear that construction companies need to become more flexible with their employee offerings in order to remain competitive, as well as preventing losing good employees to self-employment. Whether construction companies choose to offer better wages and a higher salary or provide better employee benefits, these companies need to make it valuable enough to avoid employees slipping through their fingers.
Keep up to date with all the latest news from Stax.
29th July 2025
Bira welcomes Government's new product safety laws
Bira has backed the government's move to hold online marketplaces to the same high standards as high street shops, following Royal Assent of the Product Regulation and Metrology Act.
Read More9th July 2025
New SecurLec Catalogue Launches – Helping Fill the Gap in Electrical Supply
With recent changes in the UK electrical supply chain, now more than ever, retailers and installers need a reliable source of electrical products. That’s why Stax has made a strategic investment in the SecurLec brand – helping to fill the gap and offer customers a seamless alternative.
Read More1st July 2025
Bira members asked to shape Government's Small Business Strategy
What does the high street need for Government's Small Business Strategy to work?
Read More